5:53 pm Tuesday, 10th January, 2006
why do some people not bother to reply to messages left for them. i'm sure some people do get alot of messages, but a simple thanks but no thanks would be welcomed by most people instead of just nothing. any thoughts on that from anyone? |
|
1:38 pm Monday, 16th January, 2006
Re: replying to messagesI agree entirely. It's bordering on "ignorance" and a simple "no thanks" costs nothing. |
|
9:27 pm Tuesday, 17th January, 2006
Re: replying to messagesI agree, too! In my opinion that's bad behaviour. |
|
5:50 pm Thursday, 19th January, 2006
Re: replying to messagesOne problem is that hardly anyone replies to messages and until you get to be an old hand at this, you don't realise what's going on.
|
|
12:27 pm Saturday, 21st January, 2006
Re: replying to messagesAs a girl that when she logs on has recieved about 4 pages of mail i wanted to respond to your question. it is hard to try and wade through the serious- the genuine and the timewasters. Personally i go through process decideing which mail to respond to.
|
|
12:36 pm Tuesday, 24th January, 2006
Re: replying to messagesHi blueboy, It's bad form not to reply, but you're dealing with people, so what do you expect?
|
|
11:23 pm Thursday, 2nd February, 2006
Re: replying to messagesi cant respond to messages, because everyone who send me them has their mail options set to Premium Members only. |