10:28 pm Wednesday, 20th February, 2008
Although I'm new to this site I've been swinging on and off for a few years and there's one thing that puzzles me. Some ladies and couples in their profiles say they will only meet men who are cut, ie without a foreskin. Why is this? Beyond the cleanliness thing is there any reason for it? I'm genuinley curious.
|
|
12:27 am Friday, 4th April, 2008
Re: Cut - Why The Preference?In the case of men, the underside of the foreskin is the primary absorption site for HIV viruses. It's also the primary outbreak site for herpes and certain other STDs. All else being equal, an "uncut" man thus quite simply has a statistically higher chance of having contracted andor passing on an STD.
|
|
5:21 pm Saturday, 31st May, 2008
Re: Cut - Why The Preference?In the case of men, the underside of the foreskin is the primary absorption site for HIV viruses. ....... |
|
5:05 am Saturday, 28th June, 2008
Re: Cut - Why The Preference?
|
|
11:42 pm Saturday, 16th August, 2008
Re: Cut - Why The Preference?Its a preference! Some people prefer black men, some prefer white, others tall, short, broad, hairy, etc, etc.
|
|
8:36 pm Thursday, 28th August, 2008
Re: Cut - Why The Preference?well said m8 |