The reason for writing profiles is to let others know what we are looking for, our likes and dislikes and some general information about ourselves. People spend so much time and effort into writing out profiles to make everything clear.
Then what happens??? Others don't bother reading it and get in touch asking for chats or meets and then get rude when you tell them they are not what you are looking for!
Its not rude to have specific preferences i.e. age, location, sex or even race. Its up to that person to decide what they want.
So may I suggest to all out there (men, women and couples) BEFORE contacting someone READ their profile and see if you match up to what they are looking for. DON'T just look at the pictures and assume your going to get lucky!
Oh please take into consideration that even if you do match up to what they are looking for, it doesn't mean they are going to say yes to you! They may not like your attitude, personality or even your looks and yes they are important too :)
1:26 pm Tuesday, 15th September, 2015
Whilst I agree with everything you say ,I have been in the scene longer than most I would think and I read and respect peoples profiles but this week I have received 3 mails saying sorry but you are not what we are looking for (bi male ) , I never sent any contact to any of these people having first read their profiles ,but it appears someone else did on my behalf perhaps they thought they knew better than me lol |
|
1:28 pm Tuesday, 15th September, 2015
Incidentally my profile doesn't say I am bi it clearly states straight |
|
6:36 pm Tuesday, 15th September, 2015
Sexybear,
|
|
6:50 pm Tuesday, 15th September, 2015
Whilst I maybe new on this site I have been a member on other sites and on the swing scene for many years it never fails to surprise me that people cannot be bothered to read profiles. Like most men I'll chance my arm and say hi to many a people through their profile when I might just not be an exact match but never take offence if no reply or get a polite rebuff. I do however object to these automatic messages as they can come across in a more aggressive negative attitude . |
|
8:05 pm Tuesday, 15th September, 2015
Ooops sorry SB, will now comment 'on topic'......I think some need to pay a visit to an optician and invest in a pair of reading glasses or magnifying glass in some cases as they clearly don't bother to read profiles. Bloomin wonder at times why we go to the effort of writing them as the go unread by a vast amount of people. Grrrr it has become a 'pet peeve' of mine and i don't bother replying to mails from members that haven't had the sense to read my profile before mailing :-) x |
|
6:44 am Wednesday, 16th September, 2015
"Rescued by a St Bernard in the Alps"!
|
|
8:26 am Wednesday, 16th September, 2015
chocolatelover: Would be interested to get your views on the current KitKat court case. Are you a die-hard Nestle guy ?
|
|
12:59 pm Wednesday, 16th September, 2015
Mr G: Does that mean you are having an Indian Summer? I'm envious. It's been nowt but typhoons and rain here since I got back at the end of Aug. Anyway, in the true spirit of Japanese natural disaster consciousness, it's never a bad idea to stock up with essential supplies. :-) |
|
1:08 pm Wednesday, 16th September, 2015
fmw: Yes you are right, but given the current site regime, the chances of a dedicated blog on that subject surviving are pretty slim. |
|
9:15 pm Wednesday, 16th September, 2015
So agree with SB here. But a social meet might be different, but can you spot a true profile? Now having met folk from here socially and others more intimately, being honest is the key. Politeness is also a prerequisite. Unfortunately the uncontrolled site triggered messages are a pain in the condiment.
|
|
7:47 am Thursday, 17th September, 2015
Actually I agree about umpteen reviews resulting from attendance at a social. Yes it says you are a real person, but little else. Reviews about sexual interaction are harder won and say more about how a person interacts on "all levels". |
|
2:28 pm Thursday, 17th September, 2015
"Reviews are only shown at the users discretion"
|
|
7:11 pm Thursday, 17th September, 2015
Strange that my correction of condiment to fundament with comment o changes that happen after one hits the send button got banned! I have tried to be open and honest in my profile, with reasons for why I am restricted included. There is a difference between discrete and 'hiding things.' A lovely lady that I met and still do from here does not give or accept reviews because of abuse from other members, so while I agree with Deborose in principle the ripples can stretch to others. I love her glamorous photos as well. |
|
8:14 pm Thursday, 17th September, 2015
Hey Donna. I appreciate your comments but at least I have reviews that do prove I am real and do turn up. You may prefer 55 reviews saying what a great shag you are but that is YOUR preference not mine!
|
|
2:56 am Friday, 18th September, 2015
One nighters: only wish they came my way more often :-) |
|
8:33 pm Friday, 18th September, 2015
The evil blog fairy has been turned into a despot dictator....
|
|
8:37 pm Friday, 18th September, 2015
Apparently the acronym for Youth Hostel Association is banned too!!!
|
|
11:03 pm Friday, 18th September, 2015
Probably loads of Bollocks Choco |
|
11:12 pm Friday, 18th September, 2015
Pickled in whisky i hope!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
12:10 am Saturday, 19th September, 2015
Malt i hope Sisy!? :-) x |
|
12:40 am Saturday, 19th September, 2015
'Bells' bloomin heck G, that's not proper whisky that's like bottled cold tea Eeewwwww |
|
12:43 am Saturday, 19th September, 2015
'Skebbie' leading me astray......never :-) x |
|
9:40 am Saturday, 19th September, 2015
Perhaps it is all a massive cover up by foreign intelligence services...
|
|
10:38 am Saturday, 19th September, 2015
Lostman, i am about to place the proverbial noose around my own neck with the following statement...
|
|
12:41 pm Saturday, 19th September, 2015
I suspect the overwhelming majority of site users are of the "quick fix" variety. I have never ever frequented the chat rooms on a regular basis, but the quick peeps I had there told me that they didn't fit my mindset, or the way I want to communicate with people. If I meet a woman in real life, I enjoy a bit of mind play, and I appreciate some intellectual exchange. I can only get that here, or in private e-mail. People are not all the same, and that also applies to the way they seek their stimulation, sexual or otherwise. In the same way that I prefer a romantic date and some intellectual chat, others will prefer a secluded car park off the A6. By the same analogy, I prefer to be here rather than the chat rooms. Unless the site can recognize and acknowledge the fact that at least some members prefer semi-intelligent exchange, then it has failed as an adult dating service. |
|
5:08 am Sunday, 20th September, 2015
Warning: This is going to be a long post and it may not survived the night :P |
|
8:34 am Sunday, 20th September, 2015
Scramble eggs and tolerance sound perfect Mac. :) |
|
9:04 am Sunday, 20th September, 2015
Mac, so true...
|
|
9:43 am Sunday, 20th September, 2015
Miss Valiant,
|
|
1:42 pm Sunday, 20th September, 2015
Welcum: Indeed you are right. There is a weird double standard on this site. It ostensibly pays lip service to "alternative lifestyles" on the one hand, while acting as a nanny - restricting our free expression - on the other. This "oo-er missus, 'ows yer father, norty-norty" sort of double standard simply creases me up sometimes :-) It's like one of those racy postcards you can buy at Brit seaside "resorts" :-) |