Have you watched that movie? You know, the one where that guy enters that girl gently and effortlessly and then she continues to gasp with delight while he strokes her face and smells the aroma of her hair. As the camera moves slowly out into a soft focus their bodies melt together and the soundtrack music plays something sweet and romantic as they smile at each other knowingly after their simultaneous and ever so blissful orgasms.
Yes ... you know which movie I'm talking about.
Well, you see I think this might just work if you've been together for a while or if you know each other really well after hours and hours of being in each other's company etc, but it definitely doesn't work for a quick shag with someone you hardly know.
You see, I think if he's doing it slowly then he's just not that keen. By the time we're in the hotel or bedroom (or wherever else), then I want him to be so hard and desperate for me that his cock will feel like it will melt against me when he gets close.
If we're shagging for the first time he needs to be lustful, hard, hot and be focused so much on coming that nothing will distract him. He doesn't have to slowly peel my clothes off while he kisses every inch of my delicate skin and whisper sweet nothings in my ear. I want him to moan and swear as he gets impatient because it's taking more than three seconds to get his cock out of his pants and into me.
Slow foreplay is about self control and self control just isn't very sexy (in my humble opinion). Why would he bother slowly and painstakingly unbuttoning my blouse when he could be thrusting his hard cock into me? Don't tell me foreplay is to make sure I'm turned on and still as willing to shag him as when I first agreed to meet him. If I wasn't turned on I wouldn't be there FFS!
From the very moment we’re alone and he touches me, I want my legs to shake. I want to be panting and wet and everything else that's good about being a partly naked and horny girl. For him to try to temper that with gentle kisses is an insult to the lust that I'd be feeling. If I'm horny and begging him for hardcore, he shouldn't think about giving me Barbara Cartland.
But if none of the above has persuaded him and he still wants to stroke my face, gently kiss my neck, smell the aroma of my hair and see if he can melt my ice-queen heart with the power of his lovemaking, then let’s cut to the chase: It's his turn next.
3:45 pm Sunday, 2nd February, 2014
On reflection Ronald, you'd probably be best worrying about any time spent with me. I'm talking seriously hazardous ... |
|
5:25 pm Sunday, 2nd February, 2014
Go Neanderthal. You know it makes sense. The slower stuff is for round two. |
|
12:06 am Monday, 3rd February, 2014
The trouble is that if Dixon adopts the battering-ram Neanderthal approach, invariably there is much wincing, cries of "Owwwww!!", and shrieks of protest to "slow down". There have even been gynecological accidents :-) |
|
4:49 am Monday, 3rd February, 2014
You may have a point there Skebbie, but perhaps he's more in danger of causing an accidental tracheotomy. |
|
4:58 am Monday, 3rd February, 2014
Rigger the caveman. |
|
12:13 pm Monday, 3rd February, 2014
Luv2: You mean from the bottom upwards or the top downwards ? :-) |
|
12:47 pm Monday, 3rd February, 2014
Are we back to bacon sandwiches? |
|
3:19 pm Monday, 3rd February, 2014
Dixon says to tell you that he much appreciates your "likes", and that it makes him feel a lot better knowing that so many of you are sympathetic to the problems associated with his handicap. |
|
4:12 pm Monday, 3rd February, 2014
By way of clarification my Neanderthal comment was related more to seizing the moment, acting on impulse and letting passion rule, rather than a bash em and bang em approach. |
|
5:47 pm Monday, 3rd February, 2014
Ah Rigger.....you're backtracking now... :-) I think perhaps Curvy says it all :-) |
|
6:46 pm Monday, 3rd February, 2014
Oh dear, out of all of my blogs, this one I regret writing the most. I would like to set the record straight: |
|
10:06 pm Monday, 3rd February, 2014
Too late again. But frankly there was nothing wrong with Luv2's blog. In fact it was bang on! The trouble is people will always interpret things according to their desires and fetishes. I never once thought BDSM while reading the blog. I was just imagining us both locked together, writhing fast and furious, desperate to satisfy our lust. Hands roaming hungrily. |
|
10:33 pm Monday, 3rd February, 2014
Give them an inch Luv2 and theyll take several million light years ....... |
|
12:23 am Tuesday, 4th February, 2014
Well....at least Dixon admitted he had to go easy, and didn't go up the "brute force" path :-) |
|
6:27 am Tuesday, 4th February, 2014
Ah, y'see........a well brought up girl like you shouldn't be idly straying into the neighbouring ghetto purely out of lascivious curiosity. It's a jungle there. |
|
3:14 pm Tuesday, 4th February, 2014
:-) |
|
4:48 am Wednesday, 5th February, 2014
Skebbie, you may well mock. I'll have you know my hunters are black, not green. |
|
5:16 am Wednesday, 5th February, 2014
Tom, ever read the story of O? A very erotic book about a submissive that left me feeling so uncomfortably sad, angry and confused. Yes, I know it was only a story, but I'm sure there was much truth in it. |
|
5:29 am Wednesday, 5th February, 2014
Luv2. All I can say is hear, hear :-) I think you know my views on the subject by now, so I shan't wade in any further. |
|
5:29 am Wednesday, 5th February, 2014
Ok Mac, but only if you call me ma'am and promise to say thank you afterwards. x |
|
5:37 am Wednesday, 5th February, 2014
Oh, and in the spirit of this blog and because I'm such a walking, talking contradiction, I've changed my profile picture. |
|
5:57 am Wednesday, 5th February, 2014
He seems really keen doesn't he Tom. I hope he doesn't disappoint me :-) |
|
8:27 am Wednesday, 5th February, 2014
As far as I am concerned subs should be full of steely eyed submariners (I nearly slipped into a seamen double entendre then but managed to resist it) and doms are german cathederals. |
|
8:28 am Wednesday, 5th February, 2014
Oo quite pleased now. |
|
8:55 am Wednesday, 5th February, 2014
As long as it's not "endoscope". I'm not very keen on "gyno-cams" either :-) |
|
10:28 pm Wednesday, 5th February, 2014
Really, some people are so touchy (wink wink). |
|
11:21 pm Wednesday, 5th February, 2014
Great read, I enjoyed it- thank you :') |
|
1:14 am Thursday, 6th February, 2014
That was a good read |
|
12:22 am Friday, 7th February, 2014
I would love to fill ya luv2suc |
|
4:51 am Friday, 7th February, 2014
Tomlin, wouldn't you like to at least know my name first? |
|
6:39 am Friday, 7th February, 2014
Always sticking to those pesky formalities Luv2! |
|
7:10 am Friday, 7th February, 2014
Haha, good to hear, but I was talking about TOMLIN'S offer "to fill me up". |
|
4:48 pm Friday, 14th February, 2014
Luv2!!!! Pleeeeeeese keep me in mind when the interviews for an ass spanking are taking place!!!!
|
|
5:12 pm Friday, 14th February, 2014
Oh and by the way, luv2, such a funny profile, lol ,
|
|
5:16 pm Friday, 14th February, 2014
Took your advice, lol x |
|
7:04 am Friday, 18th April, 2014
Are you missing the fact that some of the men that are here that you are hooking up with might be married and are not used to such an open and passionate attitude? I'm of the opinion that most married women are very conservitive in the bedroom and want it slow and loving. And that the "training" by our wives is what we causes us to think that's what you want?
|