Single guys only: no women or couples

.......oh.....er......I'd got a load of tequila slammers lined up for first comers, but it looks as though I'll have to down a few on my own until the lads show up. I'm beginning to feel I'm Jack Nicholson in that scene from The Shining where he's talking to the phantom barman...............

Wimmin eh....?? Can't live with 'em.....can't live without 'em......... ;-)

One recurring theme I've noticed, especially in the last couple of years, is being approached by women who are apparently falling over themselves in desperation to get to know me, and as soon as I write them a long private e-mail with many personal photos, they promptly disappear into the ether, never to be heard of again. OK I concede that I may not have Cloonyesque facial features, but most of these women are the ones who, at the outset, claim they like a "guy with a brain" :-) Clearly I still have a lot of my education to complete :-)

Couples.......or at least profiles with a "couples facade" :-) Ah those.....always an unknown quantity for us lone wolves: Is the "woman" really there? If so, is she aware the guy is posting a profile? Is she being coerced into it for fear of losing her partner? In advertising as a couple, is the male half simply on a power trip so he can enjoy putting down, humiliating or leaving to dangle all those hapless applicants who are twitching to get a tweak of his partner's elastic? Then there are "the beautiful people" who "enjoy a high standard of living". In fact they are so perfectly immaculate in every way that their pedestal is well beyond the reach of mere mortals. The sad thing is that their yardstick for measuring human worth does not seem to extend beyond The Palm at Dubai or the zone that begins with the curtain at the end of Economy and extends up towards the front of the plane. How dull life must be for them.......poor things.

If a guy doesn't have a female to contribute he can't be up to much. Amazing how sexy these guys are and with such bed-skills, that they can't even get a girl.

SG: Oi? Wot you doin' 'ere ?? :-)
No......the reason I posted this was in retaliation for a rival blog that was attempting to exclude blokes so that couples and ladies could witter away happily unfettered by the rantings of cavemen :-) However, it seems to have dropped off the radar (at least for now). So in the spirit of egalitarianism and level playing fields, I felt mischievously inclined........ :-)
Besides, I think there's no harm in providing a platform for underprivileged minorities :-)

RJ1: That's not *your* yacht in the pic is it?, or I fear I may have insulted you already :-)

But what you say echoes my point: that blokes are unjustifiably the lepers of this site, even though they don't have a monopoly on being arseholes. There are some mighty strange couples and women too out there :-)

Gardash seem to be suggesting that single men have nothing to contribute here, and that they oughtn't to be on this site. Perhaps there's a case for having a password-protected special section on this site for couples only, so that they can avoid any contagion :-)

SS: As I said about that bar - it's metaphorical. I penned this in a fit of jocular whimsy first thing in the morning Japan time :-) I'm told baking soda is good for coffee stains :-)

Spotkick: Nice to feel the censor's on *my* side for a change :-) Was wondering if heshe had made a New Year resolution to be nicer to Skebbie in 2015.

RJ1: Appreciate the concern, mate, but like you, I *do* have my moments too from time to time, so not feeling particularly hard done by :-)

Actually I was bemused by that phrase "having a female to contribute". Sounds like some sort of bargaining chip, ace up the sleeve, or an item to barter. You know.......something along the lines of "I'll raise you a woman, and I'll see your deluxe set of vibrating eggs".

Nice of SS, Stargirl and Curvy to show up for a group hug. A bit of eye candy never goes amiss at all-bloke do's, providing they know their place :-)

Why thank you ladies. Oohhh I *do* love to be assertive sometimes. Maybe I'm a 'budding dominant' :-)

Ron: I count *all* men with non-couple profiles as being eligible to participate in this virtual drink-swilling, back-slapping grousefest, whether they be single, temporarily attached, temporarily unattached, imaginarily unattached, or well and truly shackled but not letting on. The point is, we all want our 'oggins and fink we are just as deserving a cause as some geezer with a trophy wife who thinks the world owes him an his Mrs an endless succession of playful heavy-breasted nymphettes.
They're the sexual equivalent of that 1% of the world's population who will soon own more than half the world's wealth: I mean it's not right, is it?......this sexual capitalism :-)

Well sadly it's well past the witching hour here now, so I have to crash. Can't promise the same level of enthusiasm tomorrow: maybe my medication was working better than usual today :-)

Gilli,
This might come as a surprise, but you didn't have to finish off by ".....on a bit"
You could just as easily said "men do dribble" and left it at that, lol.

The only question is.. from which end?

I tend to dribble almost immediately at the sight or company of a good looking woman...

And also at the other end as I sleep, lol.


Do I give a damn? Not a jot, since learning that both Clooney and Pitt do much the same, Haha.

Slow4U: Dribbling you say? Better get your prostate checked out. Perhaps one of the reasons I was feeling a bit hyper yesterday was that I got the result of my PSA check: the level was well down and nowhere near the danger zone. (I'm paranoid about that because my old man had lots of probs with his, although I have a theory that the more you use it, the less chance of it going wrong :-)
I think "verbal diarrhoea" is what I suffer from, but it seems to keep the masses entertained nonetheless :-)

......speaking of which.........
It seems that someone in admin was kind enough to correct my elocution yesterday, and it got me thinking:
What is the term "dom" short for, exactly? Admin seem to think it's "dominant", but that's an adjective surely (unless in recent years it has also evolved into a noun on sites like this). Perhaps admin were simply keen to avoid any ambiguity. I can appreciate that unless the semantics are well defined, people could get entirely the wrong impression if someone announced they were "off to the pub for a round of doms". Or perhaps some might erroneously shy away from trying a bottle of Dom Perignon in the belief that only subs were qualified to drink it.

.....which brings me to "sub" :-) I'm assuming it doesn't mean "substitute" or "submarine", even though both are referred to by the same abbreviation. I can certainly see admin's point that careless definitions could lead to confusion and misunderstanding. In a sexual context, obviously, terms such as "sub-woofer" and "Nazi sub" could be totally misconstrued.

Haha, my prostate's fine Skebbie, but thanks for your concern.

Maybe I ought to have said 'leak', or 'get slippy' lol. (Anything but that awful 'pre-c**' which IS what I meant ) ;-)
Most guys I've ever spoken to or have read, say they also leak while in foreplay, say.. but maybe my imagination's a bit too wild, because my wotsit starts to get into the swing of things straight away and, well, just leaks !! ;-)

Ah....the perils of pre-cum :-) I suppose you could put a ligature over your foreskin if it's long enough, and then release the knot at the crucial moment :-) (This is, in fact, a little-known method of contraception that has been employed for centuries by fakirs and mystics - the foreskin itself becomes the condom.)

Good thinking.. and I did try this, but found that my eyesight became blurred and my ears leaked instead.

I don't find it a 'peril' at all though. I never have.. and will never have.. to buy a lube !! Lol.

Plus, it's good for getting tyres back on a bicycle wheel ;-)

Mac: There's only one thing guaranteed to be more fake than a teen or 20-something looking for "older men", and that's *two* of them :-)

Awww Sensual...

(Note to self: SS is a right teeeeze!) ;-)

Hahaha well... I'm teetering on the edge of giving TMI myself.. ;-)

This was a flying visit, I'm under daughters orders to pick her up in a few mins' so got to dash.

Tell you what, if we ever meet at a social, say, I'll tell you everything, deal?

Yes, never does any harm to have a giggling retinue of WAGs and groupies, providing they stay on the sidelines (^_^)

What happened to 'guys only'?
:-)

Well.....being a tolerant sort, and not wishing to be classed as a killjoy for banning any of the aspiring "ladettes" amongst us, I thought I would let them play nicely in the corner.

However, this blog has been an interesting exercise, mainly in view of the notable dearth of males who actually participated. From this I can only conclude that most males are not interested in any blogs that don't offer an opportunity for them to show off or flirt with women :-)

Mind you, I did notice that the blog that inspired the present one failed miserably to attract the "couples and women" at whom it was aimed :-)

Don't worry, Lil. I'll slip you a little something when no-one's looking :-) xx

"i've always had a problem being told what i can't or shouldn't do"

Obviously a like mind :-)

Scanning through the various profiles on this site, I can't help but be struck by the burgeoning number of women who are looking for "sissy men" who will obey them and worship the ground they walk on. Does this mean that the demand for such relationships is increasing among men, and that women think they're onto a good wheeze? Must admit I'm baffled.

Yeah but any "hot blooded male" worth his salt would not go along with that sort of arrangement. Is it simply because some conventionally hetero guys are so desperate that they'll swallow anything just to get their end away?

I really need to sit down and have a seminar with all these dominoes and submarines so they can explain their rationale and modus operandi,'coz I'm clearly missing something somewhere along the way.................

After I'd typed that, I kind of foresaw your response (lol). I agree there's probably no such thing as "totally normal or conventional" in the sexual world, so I guess my own particular view of the male-female sexual dynamic is probably run-of-the-mill in comparison to many.

Better not say that to Lil, or she's bound to assume an alternative connotation :-)

Welcome home Submiss' xx you've been missed.

SS what do you mean you are still waiting to find out who I am.. lol.
What can I say...? Let's see...

Well, I'm 6' 5" tall, slim and tanned, but quite muscled too. Full head of hair, with a few greys now, clean shaven, no glasses or walking stick.. and all my own teeth ;-)

Ohhhh... ok ok ok SOME of that lot isn't entirely honest I guess.

I'm short fat n hairy, and kind of rugby build... but the rest is true, lol.

Damn, there go my chances now.. so much for being honest.

(Note to self; yer an idiot...)

Mac, you've just got to get used to being censored.

LOTS of my scribble gets ditched too... there are blogs here that I've tried to take seriously and give genuinely thoughtful replies to (when I've thought it a serious do da..), but they rarely get onto screen.

Grrrrr... I could tear a tissue!!


But on the more serious topic of arses...
I love 'em.. and have to force myself not to take a big chomp out of them sometimes.
A lovely arse, to me, is definitely an edible body part ;-)

Arse.
Yes.....has a certain ring to it. And saying it out loud without any context just for sheer naughtiness sends a tickle of excitement up the spine. Reminds me when I was a budding disruptive at junior skool :-)

Arse is such a great word. A bit like the word 'fuck', there is usually an 'arse' to be found for most occasions: Fat-arse, smart-arse, funny-arse, sexy-arse, kiss my arse. There are more ...

Somehow never got into that US import: "ass". Too closely associated with Ebonics, and well outside my cultural comfort zone. I've always considered "rump" an under-appreciated word, but I do like it. It conjures up an image of something firm, meaty, rounded and tight, and can only be used in the context of buttocks, whereas "arse" perhaps lends itself too readily to derogatory usage.

????

I'd like some of whatever it is that Leah's on ;-)

Err.....glad to have been of service. Hope you stick around and share your thoughts and opinions too. :-)

You'll find it's quite civilized here, and a good platform for airing your views without running the risk of encountering anyone scary, as the blogs are closely monitored. See you around xx

PS: You'll need a weird sense of humour, though :-)

In Japan 9 months of the year, where I'm 9 hours ahead of UK. Will be back to good old YorksCumbs for a month from mid Feb, though.

It's even colder here :-)

Awww.....give her a chance. The poor soul is just a beginner and contacted me off the blog. Just a bit of guidance needed, that's all :-)

Love Gardash's comment. Hilarious.

I agree. It was heaven-sent for this particular blog :-)

You join a sex-site looking for big, massive willies and end up swapping DIY tips. I luvs it.
Right, can anybody tell me how to get red wine stains out of a cream coloured carpet?

Ron: Suggest you ask Rigger. He seems a very practical sort. I'm f****ing hopeless (my asterisks). Bear Grylls might be an option too, but I suspect he's too preoccupied with sucking honey from wild hornets' nests etc.

Luv2: As far as I'm concerned: take the carpet to the tip and buy a new one :-) And next time spread a tarp.

... eyes closed and making out like a wild hornets' nest right now.

Ron, if you can wire a plug, then you can wire a cooker. It's the same three wires and colours.

The world has gone health n safety mad, strike a blow for common sense, lol.
However, if you go up in flames and with a big flash.. I'll be ever so apologetic, lol.

Only joking, it's very straight forward, honest.

Mmmmmm

Bear Grylls indeed....

I really need to give Ms Luv2 a stiff talking to..

We are talking about the man who recommends pooing in a plastic bag and using it as a hand warmer. I wonder where he read that?

Not that I am bitchy or anything, Edward has carved himself out a nice niche, but honestly....

Ooo ... there's something rather exciting about the prospect of a stiff talking to :-)

I also love the characateurs u guys use.....some very wittyimg src="imagesadultemoticons026.gif" img src="imagesadultemoticons026.gif" img src="imagesadultemoticons009.gif" img src="imagesadultemoticons009.gif" hahaha

Ha! Now I see what u guys are talking about....censorship

Ha! Now I see what u guys are talking about....censorship

When I do decide to contribute to the group, it's restricted like it wasn't worthy! Lil biased aren't we?

Ahhhh, obviously I am new to this blog thing. Hahaha

ChrissySassy: I suppose none of the past blogs are technically "dead" if you know where to find them.
"Hibernating" perhaps 🙂  ?   I think what makes many blogs "successful" is that lots of people pile in and contribute while the subject matter is still new and fresh. After all.....humans tend to like novelty. This particular one was merely a sort of ill-thought-out knee-jerk reaction on my part to some frankly daft effort by someone else who was trying to make out that couples are a sort of "sexual illuminati", and had the gall to say that single men were not allowed to contribute to the thread. Of course that merely served as a red flag to a bull as far as the likes of me was concerned 🙂  However it was all strictly tongue-in-cheek (naturally 🙂 and of course anyone is free to comment as apropriate.

PS: Feel free to resurrect any of my other blogs, and .....  you never know ......  we might get a few more fun comments....

Sassy: The site?   🙂